[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Conversion question
From: |
Ralf Treinen |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Conversion question |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jun 2005 21:06:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 06:45:06PM +0700, Andrey G. Grozin wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Joris van der Hoeven wrote:
> > > I use jpeg2ps (http://www.pdflib.com/products/more/jpeg2ps.html). It
> > > produces the most compact .eps files - it just inlines jpeg image (this
> > > is allowed by PostScript, and ghostscript understands this).
> > Unfortunately, this does not seem to be standard,
> > since it is not on my computer (full installation of RedHat 9.0).
> > Is there something more standard than that ?
> Well, the choice is not very large. There is jpeg2ps (if you want rpm, it
> lives at rpm.livna.org, because the package is not quite free software,
> though it can be used for free). By the way, jpeg2ps *is* in Gentoo Linux
> (which I'm using), it's also in debian non-free. There is also imgtops2
dependency of texmacs on a non-free library would cause a problem
for debian, and for other distributions probably too. Besides, I cannot
find in debian. What is the exact name of the package?
-Ralf.
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Conversion question, Norbert Nemec, 2005/06/30