[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Conversion question
From: |
Joris van der Hoeven |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Conversion question |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:28:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 04:49:22PM +0700, Andrey G. Grozin wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Joris van der Hoeven wrote:
> > Someone knows what is the most standard way to convert a jpeg image
> > to postscript? The current way TeXmacs does this is not fully correct.
> I use jpeg2ps (http://www.pdflib.com/products/more/jpeg2ps.html). It
> produces the most compact .eps files - it just inlines jpeg image (this
> is allowed by PostScript, and ghostscript understands this).
I finally added jpeg2ps as a converter, as well as 'convert' from ImageMagick.
It is true that the produced images by jpeg2ps are about 20 times smaller...
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Conversion question, Norbert Nemec, 2005/06/30