[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Enerving confirmation for overwriting existing files
From: |
bump |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Enerving confirmation for overwriting existing files |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Oct 2005 21:24:06 -0700 |
Norbert Nemec wrote:
> I'm using TeXmacs to produce LaTeX files which I then postprocess and
> translate in LaTeX. This means that I have to export a file rather often
> to compile the LaTeX and check whether the output is correct.
>
> It has always enerved me to have to confirm the overwriting by typing
> "yes" each time. Especially, since the status line does not exactly hit
> the eye too hard, so I often forget to reconfirm the exporting.
I agree with this message.
This is one of several cases where TeXmacs sends messages to the user
that require a response to the status line. These are easily
overlooked - sometimes I will attempt to continue editing,
wonder why TeXmacs is not responding until I figure out
that there is a message that requires a "yes or no" on the
status line. Most applications would treat these with a
popup window.
Regarding the overwriting of exported latex files, it seems to me
that the default should be to accept the overwriting, or even
to overwrite silently and create a backup. Overwriting is
invariably correct. Most applications do not require explicit
approval to overwrite an automatically generated file.
> The perfect solution would be, if TeXmacs would remember that it has
> itself written that file, and that it did not change since.
Yes, this would also make a lot of sense.
Daniel Bump
- [Texmacs-dev] Enerving confirmation for overwriting existing files, Norbert Nemec, 2005/10/09
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Enerving confirmation for overwriting existing files,
bump <=
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Enerving confirmation for overwriting existing files, Joris van der Hoeven, 2005/10/10
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Enerving confirmation for overwriting existing files, David MENTRE, 2005/10/10
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Enerving confirmation for overwriting existing files, Joris van der Hoeven, 2005/10/10
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Enerving confirmation for overwriting existing files, bump, 2005/10/10
- [Texmacs-dev] Should Emacs look-and-feel really be the default on Unix?, Norbert Nemec, 2005/10/11
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Should Emacs look-and-feel really be the default on Unix?, Joris van der Hoeven, 2005/10/11
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Should Emacs look-and-feel really be the default on Unix?, Corey Sweeney, 2005/10/11
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Should Emacs look-and-feel really be the default on Unix?, Norbert Nemec, 2005/10/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Should Emacs look-and-feel really be the default on Unix?, David MENTRE, 2005/10/12
- [Texmacs-dev] (no subject), Alvaro Tejero Cantero, 2005/10/12