[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] (no subject)
|
From: |
Joris van der Hoeven |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] (no subject) |
|
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:27:03 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 11:35:50AM +0200, Alvaro Tejero Cantero wrote:
> Should the documentation be updated manually or maybe it is time to change the
> \key macro so that the argument is the name of the action, i.e. "remove
> innermost structure" and it (conditionally on the user preferences) extracts
> the
> right binding from the kbd-*.scm files?
Yes, that is the idea, but it still has to be done ;^)
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Enerving confirmation for overwriting existing files, (continued)
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Enerving confirmation for overwriting existing files, Joris van der Hoeven, 2005/10/10
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Enerving confirmation for overwriting existing files, David MENTRE, 2005/10/10
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Enerving confirmation for overwriting existing files, Joris van der Hoeven, 2005/10/10
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Enerving confirmation for overwriting existing files, bump, 2005/10/10
- [Texmacs-dev] Should Emacs look-and-feel really be the default on Unix?, Norbert Nemec, 2005/10/11
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Should Emacs look-and-feel really be the default on Unix?, Joris van der Hoeven, 2005/10/11
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Should Emacs look-and-feel really be the default on Unix?, Corey Sweeney, 2005/10/11
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Should Emacs look-and-feel really be the default on Unix?, Norbert Nemec, 2005/10/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Should Emacs look-and-feel really be the default on Unix?, David MENTRE, 2005/10/12
- [Texmacs-dev] (no subject), Alvaro Tejero Cantero, 2005/10/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] (no subject),
Joris van der Hoeven <=
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Should Emacs look-and-feel really be the default on Unix?, bump, 2005/10/12