[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: boost macros use non-portable tac

From: Peter Simons
Subject: Re: boost macros use non-portable tac
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:26:07 +0200

Hi Peter,

 > IIUC, 'tac' was introduced to reverse the order of the output from
 > 'ls', and I'm thinking that just replacing 'ls' with 'ls -r' would
 > suffice, or am I missing something?

well, if '-r' is a sufficiently well supported option to 'ls', then it
sure is an alternative to 'tac'. Would you like to prepare a patch to
make that change?

Take care,

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]