RE: [avr-libc-dev] Re: Unified ELF file [was: RE: [avr-chat] Re: GUIwrapper for avrdude]

[Eric Weddington]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
>  On Behalf Of Rick Altherr
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 10:24 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: Unified ELF file [was: RE:
> [avr-chat] Re: GUIwrapper for avrdude]
>
>
> On Aug 30, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 04:55:02PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 07:16:24AM +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> >>> If all else fails, we could still opt for differently named input
> >>> section (lfuse, hfuse, efuse), and combine them in the
> linker script
> >>> into one output section.  Again, that would be similar to
> combining
> >>> .eeprom* input sections into just one .eeprom output section right
> >>> now.
> >>
> >> Actually, I think that's neater, not least because the magic
> >> addresses
> >> are not seen in the assembler source, but reside only in the linker
> >> script, where they belong.
> >
> > The attached does it more neatly, doesn't it?   :-)
> >
> > Erik
> >
> > P.S. If there's any assembler macro mucky-stuff left to do, I'm
> > available. (Week after next. :-)
> > <fuse_demo.s>
> > <fuse_demo.ld>
> > <fuse_demo.objdump>
> > <fuse_demo.map>
> > _______________________________________________
> > AVR-libc-dev mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
>
> I posted this to avr-libc-dev just a few days ago.  I'm reposting it
> to avr-chat since most of the discussion about this topic is
> happening here.
>

Hi Rick,

I just wanted to let you know that I saw your post on avr-libc-dev (and I'm
sure Joerg did too). I haven't had a chance yet to evaluate it. Hopefully I
can get to that this weekend. I'll probably respond on avr-libc-dev as
really that's probably the appropriate place for the discussion. It's just
that there's a lot of overlap with these threads. :-)

Thanks,
Eric Weddington