Re: [cameleon-dev] delayed mail

[Alan Schmitt]

* Maxence Guesdon (address@hidden) wrote:
> 
> Yes, that's the way I do but the "main" .mli is a pain, since you have to
> maintain the same code in a.mli and b.mli in c.mli.
> 
> I'm currently writing another library, and I chose to use the -pack
> facility. I end up with the same kind of interface (my library module C
> contains modules A and B) but there is not more "main" .mli to write. The
> drawback is that ocamldoc does not (yet) handle the -pack option, so
> I have a generated doc which refers to A.t instead of C.a.t, for example,
> i.e. modules are not prefixed by the library "main" module.
> 

Pack sounds good.

> 
> > Anyway, i am interested in having your source. I have also a lot of
> > coding to do to parse some RFCes. It would be kind to have some
> > examples.
> 
> Alan, I propose that you work a little more "meta": please write a program
> which parses RFCs and generate the corresponding OCaml code ;-)

I know nothing about all this META stuff ;-)

Alan

-- 
The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen.