[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep Icons and look proposal
From: |
Banlu Kemiyatorn |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep Icons and look proposal |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Aug 2004 00:10:38 +0700 |
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 15:47:13 +0100, Nicolas Roard <nicolas@roard.com> wrote:
> hm well... I'm not sure we want to have something as detailed...
> and I'm not sure I have ideas about all that :)
> Could you perhaps write something about what you'd want ?
I ain't sure. But a guideline should cover at least on how thick the outline
of the icons should be, shouldn't it?
> Why ? we plan to support them with IconKit.. (well, technically it
> will probably use
> an ImageRep, but the point is that will be transparent for
> applications getting their
> icons via the IconKit)
The problem isn't about the rendering engine but the look of the icon
that will be different. (it would be hard to make an svg that looks exactly
like a bitmap image)
>
- Re: GNUstep Icons and look proposal, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GNUstep Icons and look proposal, M. Uli Kusterer, 2004/08/21
- Re: GNUstep Icons and look proposal, Nicolas Roard, 2004/08/21
- Message not available
- Re: GNUstep Icons and look proposal, M. Uli Kusterer, 2004/08/21
- Re: GNUstep Icons and look proposal, Nicolas Roard, 2004/08/21
- Message not available
- Re: GNUstep Icons and look proposal, M. Uli Kusterer, 2004/08/21
Re: GNUstep Icons and look proposal, Tomaž Slivnik, 2004/08/18
Re: GNUstep Icons and look proposal, Robert Burns, 2004/08/19
Re: GNUstep Icons and look proposal, Banlu Kemiyatorn, 2004/08/20
Re: GNUstep Icons and look proposal, M. Uli Kusterer, 2004/08/20