[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: evaluating numbers
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: evaluating numbers |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:50:27 +0100 |
>>>>> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:08:14 -0500, Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
>>>>> said:
Richard> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider
]]]
Richard> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,
]]]
Richard> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.
]]]
>> We could just as easily enclose the name in quotes.
Richard> That might complicate Lisp mode parsing of Lisp code, if we give
more
Richard> meanings to quotes. For instance, if we want the \N syntax to be
used
Richard> inside a string constant, using doublequotes for this would cause
complicaions.
Richard> Using singlequotes would cause other complications.
Iʼm not following. This is about the output of `what-cursor-position',
itʼs not about changing the existing ?\N{} syntax, which I donʼt think
anyone has proposed.
Robert
- Re: evaluating numbers, (continued)
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Richard Stallman, 2019/11/16
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/17
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/18
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/18
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/18
- Re: evaluating numbers, Richard Stallman, 2019/11/19
- Re: evaluating numbers,
Robert Pluim <=
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Robert Pluim, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/15
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juri Linkov, 2019/11/16
- Re: evaluating numbers, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/11/17
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juri Linkov, 2019/11/17
- Re: evaluating numbers, Juri Linkov, 2019/11/14
- Re: evaluating numbers, Stefan Monnier, 2019/11/09
- Re: evaluating numbers, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2019/11/09