Re: master 0161c9d 1/2: Load all generic-x.el modes unconditionally

[Stefan Monnier]

>> Nothing terrible.  The question for me was rather "what's the benefit?".
>> But among the disadvantages, the most obvious one is that you can't rely on
>> (require 'generic-x) to define your function.
> Yes, but the docs of the package explicitly documents this, so this is
> intended behavior.  Like I said, the package is a bit unusual; but
> being unusual doesn't mean it's bad.  It gets the job done.

I think unusual is bad unless there's some clear benefit.

Having control over which modes are auto-activated via `auto-mode-alist`
is good, so it's a part we can keep.

Having control over which functions are defined doesn't seem to offer
any benefit, so I'd rather get rid of this unusual aspect.


        Stefan