Re: Smarter M-x that filters on major-mode

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

"Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie> writes:

> The special thing about the new interactive spec is that, while it
> itself is backward incompatible, it has an equivalent
> (declare (modes ...)) form that is backward compatible.  So why not push
> only the less intrusive and more flexible of the two?

Why did we introduce the `when-let' when `let' + `when' exists?  Because
we thought `when-let' made the code clearer.

I think

(interactive "p" foo-mode)

is pretty clear, easy to understand and easy to write.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no