Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> And again, I don't see what makes extending `interactive' so special
>>> here.  We introduce new things in Emacs Lisp all the time when we think
>>> that that improves the language.
>> You're extending it in an incompatible way, one that most third-party
>> code won't be able to make use of for years to come.
> I don't think the second half of this sentence is correct.  Please see
> my compatibility macro `future-interactive' posted to this list.

Side note: IIUC this macro relies on "eager macroexpansion", so there
are corner cases where it won't work.  I don't think these matter very
much in practice, unless maybe ... have you checked that it works
correctly with Edebug?


        Stefan