Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes

[Juri Linkov]

>>>> As for verbosity, it's not like there weren't any suggestions to
>>>> reduce the number of annotations either (like tying command
>>>> definitions to packages, or custom groups, etc).
>>>
>>> And I responded to all of those and said why I thought those were bad
>>> ideas.
>>
>> Then why we are removing :group tags from defcustom?  Because they are 
>> redundant.
>> Completion annotations are redundant the same way.
>
> Not exactly in the same way, because the overwhelmingly most common case
> with :group tags is that all defcustoms in one file share the same group.
>
> With completion annotations, we have seen ratios from 50-75 %.

I don't know where you see such low ratios.  In a typical package like
gomoku.el there are 16 commands tagged with 'gomoku-mode', and 2 untagged.
This is 90% vs 10%.

It makes more sense to make tagging opt-out, i.e. to tag the whole package
like defgroup does.  Then tag only a few commands available globally.

Usually most commands in a package are internal, only a few of commands are
entry points.  Package entry points are usually tagged with the autoload cookie.

So only 10% of entry points need the `declare' tag, other 90% don't need any 
tagging.