Re: Can watermarking Unicode text using invisible differences sneak through Emacs, or can Emacs detect it?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Cc: psainty@orcon.net.nz, luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
>       kevin.legouguec@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 22:52:16 -0500
> 
>   > > Then the natural visual representations would be ă~ (a with breve,
>   > > then tilde) and ã˘ (a with tilde, then breve),
> 
>   > Either one would be fine, but the former is better, I think, since ~
>   > is an ASCII character, and so is universally supported.
> 
> That's a good point, but Yuri Khan <yuri.v.khan@gmail.com> said:
> 
>   > The ordering of diacritics on the same side of the base character is
>   > considered significant in Unicode, so ă~ and ã˘ would be
>   > representations of different grapheme clusters — “a with breve and
>   > tilde” and “a with tilde and breve”, respectively.

That's a tangent, not directly relevant to the issue at hand.  If/when
we bump into different characters that differ only by the order of the
diacriticals, we will resolve each such case one by one.