Re: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc

[Laurent Julliard]

Rich Kilmer wrote:

> > It looks just great Rich.
> > I am going to test it right now  :-)
> >
> > A short question:
> > Isn't there a problem for a future plugin.xml DTD when
> > using different attributes for the <plugin> tag ?
> >
> > You use the <plugin> tag for two different tasks
> > 1) <plugin name="Test1_Plugin" version="1.0" autostart="true>
> > (as a root element)
> >
> > 2) <plugin name="Test2_Plugin" version="*" state="RUNNING"/>
> > (nested element in <dependency>)
> >
> > which is not bad because it works for our current needs.
> >
> > Just wondering about XML compliance, and possible future
> > syntax checks in configuration files.
> >
> > cheers,
> >                 vruz
>
> yeah, you are right.  what do you think of me changing it to:
>
> <dependency ...>
>   <dependson name="Test2_Plugin" version="*" state="RUNNING"/>
> </dependency>
>
> dependson?  (it reads kind of weird)


Yes it does.


> requires? (not to be confused with Ruby require?)


plus we already have a <require>...</require> in the plugins.xml which 
really means a Ruby require


> what else?


needs or wants ?

Laurent