RE: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc

[Rich Kilmer]

I like <check>

Any arguments?

Its 6:17am here and I have not slept either ;-)

-rich

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of
> Horacio Lopez
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:46 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Rich Kilmer" <address@hidden>
> To: <address@hidden>
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:39 AM
> Subject: RE: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc
> [some snipping]
> 
> > > Just wondering about XML compliance, and possible future
> > > syntax checks in configuration files.
> > > 
> > > cheers,
> > >                  vruz
> > 
> > yeah, you are right.  what do you think of me changing it to:
> > 
> > <dependency ...>
> >   <dependson name="Test2_Plugin" version="*" state="RUNNING"/>
> > </dependency>
> > 
> > dependson?  (it reads kind of weird)
> > 
> > requires? (not to be confused with Ruby require?)
> > 
> > what else?
> > 
> > -Rich
> 
> In fact, they are dependency checks,  so each element 
> of <dependency> could be a <check>
> 
> <dependency>
>    <check name="Test2_Plugin" version="*" state="RUNNING"/>
> </dependency>
> 
> Maybe someone else has a better idea, it's 7:44 am here and
> I still haven't gotten any sleep :-)
> 
> cheers,
>                   vruz
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freeride-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/freeride-devel
>