Re: [glob2-devel] Version 3 of GPL license issued yesterday

[Kieran P]

I don't think for a project like Globulation anyone will protest to the change. Its not like Glob2 enforces the gpl2 at the moment anyway :P

But if thats how its gotta be, so far Nct and I agree to the change. From what I can see, we need Leo (unit allocation), Brad (rewrites), snth (setup mercurial), donkyhotay (bug fixes), appleboy (1-2 minor changes for mac compiling?), and Martin (libusl and cmake (which needs updating with all the new stuff btw for me to test!)) to agree to the change as well.

(names based from the commits in mercurial for the past 3 months (before we switched to mercurial))


Regards
Kieran

(on a side note, I saw we are listed at mercurial homepage: 
http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/
"2007-04-22 Globulation 2 switched from using CVS to Mercurial"
)

On 7/5/07, Cyrille Dunant <address@hidden> wrote:

On Thursday 05 July 2007 09.48:56 Kieran P wrote:
> So what was the final decision? Should 1.0.0 come with GPL v3? And if so,
> someone update it on their next commit.

There are standing issues to be resolved first... Such as getting all authors
to agree to make the mention 2 or above to 3 or above.

Else, you may distribute glob under the terms of v3, but the distributees may
choose to comply with v2 or v3 as they wish.