[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert upd
From: |
Robert Anderson |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update |
Date: |
20 Aug 2003 00:22:20 -0700 |
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 12:38, Jan Harkes wrote:
> And if I do "list reply" the response goes only to the list, just as I
> like it.
There is no "list reply" in my mailer, which is an extremely common
mailer.
> Let's assume I intentionally wanted to respond to you in private with
> this email, f.i. when I try to ask a stupid question and do not want
> to look like a complete fool on the mailing list.
>
> At the moment I can just hit reply-to and everything works fine...
This argument can be turned around for the _common case_ of replying to
the _list only_. In fact, that's what I do 99.9% of the time. So,
frankly, this whole line of reasoning leaves me totally cold and
somewhat perplexed at the insistence that I should care about it.
My preference is solidified. Tom will do what he likes with the list.
Bob
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Christian Ullrich, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Ethan Benson, 2003/08/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 2003/08/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jan Harkes, 2003/08/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update,
Robert Anderson <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] the dangers of no reply-to munging, Jan Harkes, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] the dangers of no reply-to munging, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, MJ Ray, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Ethan Benson, 2003/08/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Bader, 2003/08/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, markj, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/23