[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was
From: |
Federico Di Gregorio |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread] |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Aug 2003 19:29:22 +0200 |
Il lun, 2003-08-25 alle 18:51, Tom Lord ha scritto:
[snip]
> If evolution were more like Emacs, instead of a flamewar, since the
> members of this list are generally technically competent, somebody
> would have posted some code to stick your .evolution file if you want
> a reply-to-list button. If that code were good, it would likely
> spread among technical users, perhaps receiving further polish. In an
> office where mailing lists are important, the IT department might
> install the extension on behalf of non-technical users. Eventually,
> sure, it would likely make it into the official distribution.
sorry for arriving so late in the discussion, but what's wrong with
evolution builtin reply-to-list? i used it just a sec before to answer
to your mail. menu Action->Reply to list or Alt-A L.
--
Federico Di Gregorio
Debian GNU/Linux Developer address@hidden
INIT.D Developer address@hidden
Generated by Signify v1.10 [http://www.debian.org/]
-- brought to you by One Line Spam
signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio รจ firmata
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Tom Lord, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Robert Collins, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Mark A. Flacy, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change?, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread],
Federico Di Gregorio <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], MJ Ray, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Christian Ullrich, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Ethan Benson, 2003/08/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 2003/08/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jan Harkes, 2003/08/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 2003/08/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] the dangers of no reply-to munging, Jan Harkes, 2003/08/22