[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread] |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 00:04:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 07:25:56AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 03:36, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > However, evolution already has a reply-to-list feature. It took me
> > about five minutes to find this, while glancing at the code. I've no
> > idea where the corresponding button is, since I don't use evolution.
>
> Action Menu->Reply To List.
What were we all arguing about again? I seem to recall something about
evolution not having a reply-to-list feature being raised a few times.
Who *said* that, anyway?
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
pgpPRWrHpNcsZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] something _interesting_ for (Re: ... no reply-to munging ...), (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] something _interesting_ for (Re: ... no reply-to munging ...), Tom Lord, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Tom Lord, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Tom Lord, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Robert Collins, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread],
Andrew Suffield <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Mark A. Flacy, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change?, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Federico Di Gregorio, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], MJ Ray, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Christian Ullrich, 2003/08/23