Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update

[Tom Lord]

    > From: Jonathan Walther <address@hidden>

    > On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:01:42PM +0100, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
    > >Why doesn't mailing list software just let subscribers decide whether 
they
    > >want the Reply-To header munged on their copies of list posts? It would 
me=
    > an
    > >bulk deliveries had to be done in two groups, but this isn't that big a
    > >deal. Everyone could be happy that way. Probably the default would be to
    > >munge, and those with mailers that support list-reply or whatever could 
tu=
    > rn
    > >that off.=20

    > Now THAT sounds like the most easily accomplished path forward.  And
    > instead of just munging Reply-To: for those that choose it, it can also
    > move any current Reply-To: to X-Personal-Reply-To: or something so it
    > doesn't get lost.  Color me convinced!  This scheme wins, because it can
    > be done piece by piece without pain agony or fuss.


How very sad.   The next generation hates you even more than you (at
least should) hate the last.

-t