[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?
From: |
Ethan Benson |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful? |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:55:16 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 08:26:39PM +0100, Stig Brautaset wrote:
> On Aug 23 2003, Maksim wrote:
> >
> > Having read in the tla docs that tagline is the recommended tagging
> > method, I'm wondering what the compelling reasons for using it are?
>
> I don't have to use special tools to move a file -- `mv' works fine.
> Same for removing a file.
unless the file is of a type incompatible with tagline, if you have
those then you must remember which ones are using tagline and which
ones don't before doing a move.
it occurs to me that explicit tagging could work the same way as
tagline in that tla move/delete would not be needed, if the tag was
stored in an extended attribute. unfortunatly this would not be
portable in the least.
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
pgperJdxEnmmi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, Maksim Lin, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, Tom Lord, 2003/08/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Stig Brautaset, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?,
Ethan Benson <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jan Hudec, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jan Hudec, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Tom Lord, 2003/08/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jan Hudec, 2003/08/27