[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?
From: |
Jan Hudec |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 12:07:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 01:41:40PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Jan Hudec <address@hidden> writes:
> > It also removes the braindamage of patch, which does not have an option
> > to ignore already applied chunks (very good for merging).
>
> patch has -N:
>
> -N --forward Ignore patches that appear to be reversed or already applied.
Thanks. It seems I am blind :-(.
If it works, could it become one of default options in arch? It would
help in star-merge a little bit.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec
<address@hidden>
- [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, Maksim Lin, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, Tom Lord, 2003/08/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Stig Brautaset, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Ethan Benson, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jan Hudec, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?,
Jan Hudec <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Tom Lord, 2003/08/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jan Hudec, 2003/08/27