[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 07:34:13 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Jan Hudec <address@hidden>
> > patch has -N:
> > -N --forward Ignore patches that appear to be reversed or already
applied.
> Thanks. It seems I am blind :-(.
> If it works, could it become one of default options in arch? It would
> help in star-merge a little bit.
That'd be actually pretty easy to work up a patch for if you're
interested.
The low-level function `run_patch' already excepts a flag that causes
`--forward' to patch. It's a simple matter of propogating the
parameter up to arch_apply_changeset and back to the command line
options of various commands.
I prefer that it not be the default, but a --forward option to various
merging commands would be fine.
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, Maksim Lin, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, Tom Lord, 2003/08/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Stig Brautaset, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Ethan Benson, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jan Hudec, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jan Hudec, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?,
Tom Lord <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Miles Bader, 2003/08/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jan Hudec, 2003/08/27