[Gnu-arch-users] {arch} perms -> shared revlib?

[Zenaan Harkness]

-----Forwarded Message-----
> From: Zenaan Harkness <address@hidden>
> To: arch <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] {arch} perms - {arch} in revlib?
> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:21:58 +1000
> 
> On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 09:01, John Meinel wrote:
> > Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > > Does {arch} go in revlibs - or should I leave its perms at 700?
> > > 
> > > tia
> > > zen
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > It should be in revlibs, because it's where all the patchlogs go, and 
> > I'm sure those are in revlibs.
> 
> But then I guess I need to delete {arch}/++pristine-trees?
> 
> Or perhaps I should just do the perms changes in my
> central/pivot/stable tree, and then tag back off of that?
> 
> If so (me@ tags off of stable (which originally tagged off of me),
> can I just mv my ,,undo-* dirs to my newly "tag/get"ed tree?
> 
> It just feels like whatever I do, I'm about to get bitten...
> which I don't like of course.

It appears some files in wd/{arch} are included in patches/ the archive.

I am trying to create a shared revlib.

I can't blindly change the perms of everything in {arch} since it
contains pristine-trees.

What can/ should I change to group rw(x) under {arch}/?

tia
zen