Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: recent changes

[Andy Tai]

I am using the behavior of baz 1.4 as the template.  I will examine the 1.5 
behavior further.

I did the manual merge because I wanted to use tla as the basis and Tom did not 
like some of the
later additions of baz and clearly the baz changes were large. I wanted to keep 
the tla base
intact, at least for now, as it is a generally reliable base and we do not want 
to do
revolutionary changes for Arch 1 anyway--the new designs all happen elsewhere.

--- Matthieu Moy <address@hidden> wrote:

> Andy Tai <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > tla switch revision
> >
> > to switch the current directory to the specified revision
> 
> Is there a particular reason why you rejected all the improvements of
> Bazaar 1.5 in the switch command?
> 
> Also, I don't understand why you take code from Bazaar manually
> instead of actually merging. Actually, I don't understand why you
> don't take Bazaar itself as a base, and pull out the things you don't
> like in it. Well, it depends up to which point you want to bring tla.
> For example, are you interested in Bazaar's archive registry, or its
> cache mechanism? If you have good reasons to reject them, then you're
> probably on the right way since they're relatively deep changes in the
> code, hard to pull out automatically.
> 
> -- 
> Matthieu
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
> 
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
> 


Andy Tai, address@hidden
Free Software: the software by the people, of the people and for the people! 
Develop! Share! Enhance! Enjoy!