[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help
From: |
Alfred M\. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 01:29:34 +0100 |
100+ commands confuse the hell out of most people. Should I use
rbrowse or abrowse? get or grab? changes or diff? update or replay?
I can go on and on. We could show everything if the everything is
self consistant and orthogonal; however tla is clearly not the
case.
Wouldn't it then be better to make things self consitent instead? Not
exactly sure what you are refering to... If the help output is so bad
that it makes it hard to understand what a command does, then the
output should be improved.
Anyway, in my patch, you can still get all the commands from tla
help -a. Two extra letters shouldn't be that big of a problem?
It isn't the extra two letters, it is changing a default behaviour of
something that I atleast consider very sane. I could for example say
the same thing to you, you can still use `tla help -f' to get a list
about something specific, so that shouldn't be a big problem for you
either right? :-)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: clean up tla help, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: clean up tla help, David Allouche, 2005/11/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, ams, 2005/11/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Daniel Stone, 2005/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Andy Tai, 2005/11/20
RE: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Derek Zhou, 2005/11/19
RE: [Gnu-arch-users] clean up tla help, Derek Zhou, 2005/11/19