[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:57:43 -0000

me wrote:
> Hyman Rosen wrote:
> > On 8/5/2010 12:52 PM, RJack wrote:
> >> Why bother to get it reversed? The useless opinion carries with it no
> >> precedential value whatsoever.
> >
> > Of course, the cranks in this newsgroup were quite pleased
> > when the earlier district court decision that their way. It
> > is natural to believe that confirming opinions are brilliant
> > and dissenting ones irrelevant. Nevertheless, we now have a
> > court opinion which unequivocally upholds copyright conditions
> > in an open license.
> Please translate.

Hyman Rosen is spin doctoring CAFC's Jacobsen opinion in the same way as
Kuhn's Blog is spin doctoring the recent "GPL victory".



"I'm really glad that a judge has agreed that the GPL is important
enough a license to warrant an injunction on out-of-compliance
distribution. This is a major step forward in GPL enforcement in the
USA. "

My, what a crook...


(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]