[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: List posting rules
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
Re: List posting rules |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Nov 2019 21:37:49 +0100 |
Hi Sandra,
On Sat, 2019-11-02 at 13:21 -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 11/2/19 1:01 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>
> > The purpose of this list is spelled out in the list description.
> > Sandra didn't post a discussion about governance, she didn't talk
> > about restructuring the GNU Project. She spoke only about existing
> > leadership.
> >
> > Governance discussions, those talking about governance models, and how
> > to restructure GNU, should stay on topic, and should *not* talk about
> > people and their capabilities.
>
> I apologize for straying from the list rules. I was not aware of
> exactly what they were when I posted; I thought this was the public
> equivalent of the private gnu-and-fsf list where I'd previously sent
> similar remarks.
No need to apologize at all. You didn't break any rules. The list rules
are more like guidelines [*] that are interpreted in the most favorable
terms for first time posters. The moderation/enforcement of the rules
is only because we noticed in the past there are sometimes people
posting multiple times a day repeatedly ignoring the guidelines
creating a very hostile environment.
> The list owners can delete my previous mails from the list archives, if
> that seems appropriate. But in that case I hope the various list
> messages accusing me of hysteria, lying, slander, etc would also be deleted.
Some of those replies were completely disrespectful personal sexist
attacks on you personally. As a moderator I apologize some of those
were let through.
Cheers,
Mark
[*] Just for reference, this is from the gnu-misc-discuss info page:
Flaming is out of place. Tit-for-tat is not welcome. Repetition
should not occur.
Good READING and writing are expected. Before posting, wait a while,
cool off, and think.
So take your time to reply and think whether you actually have a new
point to make, or if you are just restating your opinion again. If
possible bundle your replies to several messages. Restricting yourself
to just one message a day to the list is not a bad thing.
Don't just reply to every message repeating your opinion or have a tit-
for-tat discussion with just one member of the list. Also consider
addressing the list directly and remove individuals from the CC to
prevent a rapid fire back-and-forth between two people simply
disagreeing without the messages even having made it to the list yet.
Make sure you have read the kind communication guide:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.html
Some important points from that: Assume other participants are posting
in good faith, even if you disagree with what they say. Please do not
criticize people for wrongs that you only speculate they may have done;
stick to what they actually say and actually do. Please respond to what
people actually said, not to exaggerations of their views. Your
criticism will not be constructive if it is aimed at a target other
than their real views. If in a discussion someone brings up a tangent
to the topic at hand, please keep the discussion on track by focusing
on the current topic rather than the tangent. If you think the tangent
is an important and pertinent issue, please bring it up as a separate
discussion, with a Subject field to fit, and consider waiting for the
end of the current discussion.
And for GNU Project governance discussion threads, they should stay
on topic and be strictly about governance and not about specific
people and their respective abilities.
- List posting rules, (continued)
- List posting rules, Mark Wielaard, 2019/11/01
- Re: List posting rules, Dora Scilipoti, 2019/11/01
- Re: List posting rules, Carlos O'Donell, 2019/11/01
- Re: List posting rules, Jean Louis, 2019/11/01
- Re: List posting rules, Ruben Safir, 2019/11/01
- Re: List posting rules, Alexandre François Garreau, 2019/11/01
- Re: List posting rules, Ruben Safir, 2019/11/02
- Re: List posting rules, Dora Scilipoti, 2019/11/02
- Re: List posting rules, Carlos O'Donell, 2019/11/02
- Re: List posting rules, Sandra Loosemore, 2019/11/02
- Re: List posting rules,
Mark Wielaard <=
- Re: List posting rules, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/02
- Re: List posting rules, Marcel, 2019/11/02
- Re: List posting rules, DJ Delorie, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Mark Wielaard, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Jean Louis, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Ruben Safir, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Jean Louis, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Samuel Thibault, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Mark Wielaard, 2019/11/03
- Re: List posting rules, Jean Louis, 2019/11/03