Re: doc value of regtests: none

[Graham Percival]

Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2007/8/31, Graham Percival <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>:
>
> > The *only* reason that the regtests are still on the main doc page is
> > that it gives us a nice set of 3 4x4 blocks of items.  If I wasn't so
> > fussy (obsessive? :) about presentation, I'd remove it from that page in
> > an instant.
>
> ahahaha :)
> I wondered why the link was still here...
> For what it's worth, I often say to myself that the Bibligraphy link 
> is not mandatory.
> Besides, it would be nice if the Program usage was aligned with the 
> User manual.
> What about the following presentation?
It's certainly tempting.  We'd need to move the current "Bibliography" 
info into Appendix A "Literature List"  (I don't know why they're 
separate, anyway).

Anybody else have thoughts about this?

Cheers,
- Graham