lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: why is Dutch the default language for note-entry?


From: Hans Aberg
Subject: Re: why is Dutch the default language for note-entry?
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:04:08 +0100

On 18 Dec 2008, at 20:40, <address@hidden> wrote:

If you want to fit all the world languages into one keyboard map, you
might join the Unicode list; there are more than 100000 characters
available.

Unicode is a good solution for recording the result internally, but as far
as I know keyboard layout is still an open issue, with a variety of
standards groups at the country level offereing script-specific solutions
that are probably irreconcilable to any kind of universal solution.

Right. So the best one can hope for is a series of keyboard maps that perhaps unify groups of characters, that those that so like may use.

Last
I knew (Mac OS 7) Apple had effective script-specific keyboard layouts for simple writing systems that allowed direct entry (once switched to), and
employed special typing agents for indirect C J K entry.

Mac OS X has a keyboard layout that allows one to enter a character by its Unicode number (code point). So there is then already at least one keyboard map that covers all Unicode characters. But it isn't very convenient.

On the other hand, it is easy to switch keyboard maps, on mine it is <command><space>.

So it might be possible to make one layout for entering notes and accidentals. One can make a whole series, of course, that only needs somebody willing to do it. But keyboard maps can of course handle combining character sequences as well, covering many more characters.

Could be worse, historical chinese typesetting not only required fluency,
but also physical handling of some 60,000 individual 'sorts' of
characters; imagine that set of cases.

I do not know what they use - check on the Unicode list. One in the past that was claimed to be fast was to do some typing an then getting a display of possibilities, which one then chooses from. Modern fonts can typeset by radicals, so they do not need to store all characters; perhaps that can be used for typing as well.

  Hans






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]