[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:37:01 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 01:32:21PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > We have two ways of making it not a Critical issue:
> > 1) make the output the same. If that means fiddling with the
> >
> > 2) metaphorically look our users in the eye and tell them that we
> > address@hidden Lyric ties are no longer supported.
> >
> > But as far as releases go, that's the story.
>
> It wasn't my intent to be controversial with my assessment of the
> situation. Sorry.
Oh, I didn't take this as controversial. And I wanted the chance
to point out that documenting that "X is no longer supported" is a
perfectly valid way of getting 2.14 out the door, for any X. You
have absolutely nothing to apologize for!
Cheers,
- Graham
- Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Phil Holmes, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Phil Holmes, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Graham Percival, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Patrick McCarty, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Graham Percival, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Patrick McCarty, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Phil Holmes, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Carl Sorensen, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Graham Percival, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Bernard Hurley, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Francisco Vila, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Bernard Hurley, 2011/02/13
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/02/13
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Bernard Hurley, 2011/02/12
Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Patrick McCarty, 2011/02/12