[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
From: |
Phil Holmes |
Subject: |
RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:45:19 +0100 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> On Behalf Of Trevor Daniels
> Sent: 06 September 2011 10:27
> To: Graham Percival; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
>
>
> Graham Percival wrote Monday, September 05, 2011 9:39 PM
> >
> > http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_11.html
> >
>
> I'm happy with this proposal, but the origin/dev branches are
> not mentioned explicitly. Presumably they remain unchanged?
>
> Trevor
Another thought. We've established a standard (that not everyone adopts,
but it's still a standard) that the git repository is locally stored in
lilypond-git with the build being done in lilypond-git/build. Where would
these new repositories be locally stored?
--
Phil
- GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Graham Percival, 2011/09/05
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/05
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Trevor Daniels, 2011/09/06
- RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories,
Phil Holmes <=
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Graham Percival, 2011/09/06
- RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Phil Holmes, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Graham Percival, 2011/09/06
- RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Phil Holmes, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Graham Percival, 2011/09/06
- RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Phil Holmes, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Wols Lists, 2011/09/07
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Carl Sorensen, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Trevor Daniels, 2011/09/06