[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 21:22:09 +0200 |
2011/9/6 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>:
> But your last statement forces a particular location. What if on my system
> I have a conflict with that location? I shouldn't be forced to do it.
>
> Currently, I don't use lilypond-git. And I don't do an out-of-tree build
> (because it doesn't work for me on OS/X, and I don't want to use lilydev,
> and I don't want to take the time to troubleshoot it). And I'm able to deal
> with non-standard locations just fine.
>
> If you say I "must" put them where you say, then I lose that flexibility.
>
> I'm totally fine with having lilydev set up environment variables with the
> standard directories. And I'm fine with saying "The standard locations
> are...." But enforcing the use of standard locations would be a mistake,
> IMO.
+1
cheers,
Janek
- RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, (continued)
- RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Phil Holmes, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Graham Percival, 2011/09/06
- RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Phil Holmes, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Graham Percival, 2011/09/06
- RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Phil Holmes, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Graham Percival, 2011/09/06
- RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Phil Holmes, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Wols Lists, 2011/09/07
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Carl Sorensen, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Trevor Daniels, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Graham Percival, 2011/09/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/09/06