RE: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories

[Phil Holmes]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graham Percival [mailto:address@hidden 
> Sent: 06 September 2011 17:49
> To: Phil Holmes
> Cc: 'Trevor Daniels'; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 11: git repositories
> 
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:45:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> > Another thought.  We've established a standard (that not everyone 
> > adopts, but it's still a standard) that the git repository 
> is locally 
> > stored in lilypond-git with the build being done in 
> > lilypond-git/build.  Where would these new repositories be 
> locally stored?
> 
> Wherever they want.  We currently have an average of 3 commits per
> *year* to those branches (and the things they would replace). 
>  If they were easier to find, it might go up to 10 commits 
> per year, but I really doubt that it'd go higher.
> 
> The only kind of person who's interested in those other 
> repositories will have their own favorite directory layout 
> anyway (like me; all my source repositories go under 
> $HOME/src/) so they'd ignore any recommendation anyway.

Wouldn't it be better to standardise them so that the doc and website builds
can copy them using standard scripts?

--
Phil