[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make dist broken
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: make dist broken |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:20:31 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 07:14:53PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote:
> So - presumably make dist creates the tarball, and as part of it, it
> calls make distcheck to compare the tarball with the source tree.
> Does that sound sensible?
In normal unix packages, 'make dist' createa a tarball, then 'make
distcheck' expands the tarball, runs configure make make clean,
then compares the result. Something like that.
Look, the "make dist broken" is just a subject line that I typed.
I can't remember the exact message the GUB gave, but it's the
usual one that happens whenever people add a new translation.
Search the mailing list archives to see me complaining about it in
the past, as well as explaining how to fix it. And/or look for
such messages in the git commit log. Something like "fix make
dist" or "build: dist fix" should probably find the right commits.
- Graham
- make dist broken, Graham Percival, 2012/02/15
- Re: make dist broken, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/15
- Re: make dist broken, Graham Percival, 2012/02/15
- Re: make dist broken, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/15
- Re: make dist broken,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: make dist broken, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/15
- Re: make dist broken, Graham Percival, 2012/02/15
- Re: make dist broken, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/15
- Re: make dist broken, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/15
- Re: make dist broken, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/15
- Re: make dist broken, Graham Percival, 2012/02/15
- Re: make dist broken, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/16
- Re: make dist broken, Francisco Vila, 2012/02/16
- Re: make dist broken, David Kastrup, 2012/02/16
- Re: make dist broken, catchall, 2012/02/16