Re: Stable release.

[Graham Percival]

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 07:33:12AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> My proposal was just about a release addressing bit rot, namely just
> making sure that the equivalent of the existing release 2.14.2 can be
> compiled (with no regressions due to the recompilation) on current
> systems that insist on not using precompiled binaries from us (which is
> quite sensible for distributing GPLed software).

Assuming that this is a 10-minute job, put stuff in the
stable/2.14 git branch, just in case somebody grabs the source
from git tarball.

Once that's done, somebody might take a look at running GUB, then
at least we'd be able to make some intelligent guesses about
what's involved there.

- Graham