[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stable release.
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Stable release. |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:34:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 09:30:12AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Assuming that this is a 10-minute job, put stuff in the
> > stable/2.14 git branch, just in case somebody grabs the source
> > from git tarball.
>
> It's more than 10 minutes since I have to through
> hide-and-seek-and-recompile-and-check a few times. But I don't think it
> will take me longer than a few hours.
Your computer really isn't suited to this task. I suggest that
you wait a few days and hope that somebody else will volunteer --
possibly in conjunction with you? i.e. you could prepare a git
branch (maybe dev/2.14-proposed or something like that), then the
other person could try to compile it, then send you the build
failure and you can go hunt&cherry-pick the relevant commit.
There's no rush for this at all, so it doesn't matter if it takes
two weeks with a day of lag each way.
- Graham
- Re: Stable release., (continued)
Re: Stable release., Pavel Roskin, 2012/06/25
- Re: Stable release., David Kastrup, 2012/06/26
- Re: Stable release., Pavel Roskin, 2012/06/26
- Re: Stable release., David Kastrup, 2012/06/26
- Re: Stable release., Graham Percival, 2012/06/26
- Re: Stable release., David Kastrup, 2012/06/26
- Re: Stable release.,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Stable release., Phil Holmes, 2012/06/26
- Re: Stable release., David Kastrup, 2012/06/26
- Re: Stable release., David Kastrup, 2012/06/26
- Re: Stable release., Martin Tarenskeen, 2012/06/26
- Re: Stable release., David Kastrup, 2012/06/26
Re: Stable release., Phil Holmes, 2012/06/26
Re: Stable release., David Kastrup, 2012/06/26