[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: allowing \f and \F
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: allowing \f and \F |
|
Date: |
Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:32:22 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Keith OHara <address@hidden> writes:
> Werner LEMBERG <wl <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Please no heuristics.
>
> By "we" I meant us humans in charge of the software. We humans would
> avoid choosing names like keySignature and KeySignature distinguished
> only by case.
No question about that. Coming up with good names is not necessarily
easy (I am grateful for lambda often saving me the trouble), but this is
one case where the extra headache seems like a good investment.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, (continued)
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- allowing \f and \F (was: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint), Graham Percival, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F (was: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint), Keith OHara, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Keith OHara, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, David Kastrup, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Graham Percival, 2012/09/22
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Sue Daniels, 2012/09/24
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Graham Percival, 2012/09/23
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/24
- Re: allowing \f and \F, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/20