[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: allowing \f and \F
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: allowing \f and \F |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:21:02 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 09:19:03AM +0100, Sue Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Sunday, September 23, 2012 3:20 AM
>
> > That's certainly a consistent view to take, but it might be worth
> > discussing that further at some point. If there's a separate
> > namespace then I can't see any technical problems, and some users
> > may appreciate being able to define short strings like $a or $f
> > without any conflict with existing commands and keywords.
>
> Other users may wish to redefine predefs. That ability is more
> valuable, I think.
Nothing's stopping us from having the normal \commands (including
both predefs and user-created and user-redefined), along with
$commands (which is completely empty and available for any user
definitions).
- Graham
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, (continued)
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- allowing \f and \F (was: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint), Graham Percival, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F (was: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint), Keith OHara, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Keith OHara, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, David Kastrup, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, David Kastrup, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Graham Percival, 2012/09/22
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Sue Daniels, 2012/09/24
- Re: allowing \f and \F,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Janek WarchoĊ, 2012/09/24
- Re: allowing \f and \F, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/20
- Message not available
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Thomas Morley, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/21
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/21
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/22