[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: allowing \f and \F
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: allowing \f and \F |
|
Date: |
Sat, 15 Sep 2012 23:43:06 +0200 (CEST) |
>> > I did not hear any serious desire to allow both \f and \F as
>> > distinct.
>>
>> Ugh, it seems that you haven't read my strong objections a few
>> hours ago.
>
> You mostly objected to LilyPond /ignoring/ case, for reasons that
> made sense.
Oops, yes.
Werner
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, (continued)
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/17
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/18
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/09/18
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- allowing \f and \F (was: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint), Graham Percival, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F (was: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint), Keith OHara, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Keith OHara, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, David Kastrup, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: allowing \f and \F, David Kastrup, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Graham Percival, 2012/09/22
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Sue Daniels, 2012/09/24
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Graham Percival, 2012/09/23
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Janek WarchoĊ, 2012/09/24
- Re: allowing \f and \F, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/20
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/20