[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-2.0 and debian
From: |
Paul |
Subject: |
Re: guile-2.0 and debian |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Nov 2016 01:02:40 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
On 11/23/2016 06:09 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
Currently it seems I'm the only one being able to test Antonio's patches.
This is not exactly optimal.
[...]
Having a LilyDev with guile 2.0.12/13 may help.
I for one would be more likely to help with testing if there were a
LilyDev with guile 2.0.12/13
Thanks Antonio, Harm, David, Federico, et al, for your work on this.
-Paul
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian,
Paul <=
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Knut Petersen, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, karl, 2016/11/25
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/25
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/25
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/25
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/25