[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-2.0 and debian
From: |
karl |
Subject: |
Re: guile-2.0 and debian |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Nov 2016 14:00:09 +0100 (CET) |
Jan-Peter Voigt:
> Am 24.11.2016 um 16:10 schrieb Antonio Ospite:
> > And about the choice between guile 1.8 or 2.0.12/13, it should be
> > possible to have both guile-1.8 and guile-2.0 packages installed in the
> > same image and then let lilypond choose which one to pick up at
> > configure-time, shoudln't it?
> I doubt that. You can install guile 1.8 and 2.0 in one system, but not
> guile-dev 1.8 and 2.0 AFAICS. So one needs to separate systems for each
> version of guile.
>
> Or am I wrong?
I get this on a gentoo system:
# emerge lilypond
[...]
checking for guile-config... ./configure: line 7604: 11151 Aborted
$exe --version > /dev/null 2>&1
no
checking guile compile flags... ;;; note: source file
/usr/share/guile/1.8/ice-9/boot-9.scm
;;; newer than compiled /usr/local/lib/guile/2.0/ccache/ice-9/boot-9.go
Throw without catch before boot:
Throw to key syntax-error with args ("memoization" "In file ~S, line ~S: ~A
~S." ("/usr/share/guile/1.8/ice-9/boot-9.scm" 101 "Bad define placement"
(define (toplevel-env? env) (or (not (pair? env)) (not (pair? (car env))))))
#f)Aborting.
checking guile link flags... ;;; note: source file
/usr/share/guile/1.8/ice-9/boot-9.scm
;;; newer than compiled /usr/local/lib/guile/2.0/ccache/ice-9/boot-9.go
Throw without catch before boot:
Throw to key syntax-error with args ("memoization" "In file ~S, line ~S: ~A
~S." ("/usr/share/guile/1.8/ice-9/boot-9.scm" 101 "Bad define placement"
(define (toplevel-env? env) (or (not (pair? env)) (not (pair? (car env))))))
#f)Aborting.
[...]
# /usr/bin/guile-config --version
guile-config - Guile version 1.8.8
# /usr/local/bin/guile-config --version
guile-config - Guile version 2.0.9
and putting v1.8.8 before v2.0.9 in the search patch doesn't help.
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, (continued)
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Paul, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Knut Petersen, 2016/11/24
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian,
karl <=
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/25
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/25
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/25
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/25
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Knut Petersen, 2016/11/25
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Knut Petersen, 2016/11/25
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/25
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Paul, 2016/11/26
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/26
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/26