Re: guile-2.0 and debian

[David Kastrup]

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> 2016-11-24 16:10 GMT+01:00 Antonio Ospite <address@hidden>:
>>> On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 14:03:32 +0100
>>> Federico Bruni <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> with the container and/or LilyDev for guile2 we are going to have some
>> stuff to simplify the workflow, attracting more people.
>> It's still tedious to add Antonios patches.
>> How about creating a public branch?
>> I could do this in the evening (if I remember the syntax)
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> Shouldn't most of them be able to become part of master?

Though the time frame of master moves in weeks, and the impetus of
developer activity may move in hours.

So a separate branch for communication might indeed be a reasonable
short-term measure.

-- 
David Kastrup