Re: Mixed chord/note mode

[Lukas-Fabian Moser]

Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> schrieb am Mi., 24. Aug. 2022, 14:18:

> Le 24/08/2022 à 10:28, Lukas-Fabian Moser a écrit :
> > This has the drawback, of course, of needing c:4 instead of c4, but
> > personally, I wouldn't be bothered very much by this. But of course
> > it's very likeliy that this idea would create syntactical ambiguities
> > that I didn't spot yet.
>
>
>
> IIUC, in this scheme, the optional modifier(s) come right after the root
> with a dot, then there is a colon and the chord duration?
>
> If that is correct, change that c:4 to c:8 and you will already spot a
> problem.
>

*facepalm*

I never liked (nor used) the :8 tremolo shorthand. To be honest, I didn't
even know that it's even possible to use it without a duration.

(But I'm asking myself if the :8 should even be supported in chordmode.
Anyway I'm not talking about a unified chord/note mode here.)


> OTOH, you could have "c.:8", making the dot mandatory even if there is
> no modifier, but I think we'll agree it looks ugly.
>

Yes.

Lukas