[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dependecies
|
From: |
Jan-Henrik Haukeland |
|
Subject: |
Re: Dependecies |
|
Date: |
21 Sep 2002 00:16:51 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service) |
Rory Toma <address@hidden> writes:
> I believe that this is more flexible, takes advantage of things monit
> already does, and adds the least amount of code and complexity to the
> existing code. (I.e. I spent some amount of time figuring out how to get
> this in with the least amount of code)
That was some very good arguments :-) One request though, if not
implemented, could you do: 'depend b c' as well?
--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
- monit spawn.c, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/09/06
- monit spawn.c, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/09/12
- Potential FreeBSD bug, rory, 2002/09/13
- Re: Potential FreeBSD bug, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/09/13
- Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies,
Jan-Henrik Haukeland <=
- Re: Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/09/21
- Re: Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/09/21
- Re: Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20