monit-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dependecies


From: Rory Toma
Subject: Re: Dependecies
Date: 20 Sep 2002 17:52:55 -0700

There is a lot of redundancy in stop and start.c.

After I get this dependency stuff done, I think I'm going to combine
start and stop into one function. It becomes much more apparent when
doing multiple actions...

On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 15:31, Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
> Rory Toma <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 15:16, Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
> > > Rory Toma <address@hidden> writes:
> > > 
> > > > I believe that this is more flexible, takes advantage of things monit
> > > > already does, and adds the least amount of code and complexity to the
> > > > existing code. (I.e. I spent some amount of time figuring out how to get
> > > > this in with the least amount of code)
> > > 
> > > That was some very good arguments :-) One request though, if not
> > > implemented, could you do: 'depend b c' as well?
> > 
> > Version 2.
> 
> Maybe you can use the same "strategy" in the parser (p.y) for the
> depend statement as we use in the checksum statement?  the checksum
> statement support both versions, e.g.
> 
> checksum file1, file2, file3
> 
> and/or
> 
> checksum file1
> checksum file2
> checksum file3
> 
> -- 
> Jan-Henrik Haukeland
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> monit-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-dev
> 
-- 
Rory Toma               address@hidden
VP of Run Level 5       http://www.trs80.net
Digeo Digital           http://www.digeo.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]