[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dependecies
From: |
Jan-Henrik Haukeland |
Subject: |
Re: Dependecies |
Date: |
21 Sep 2002 00:31:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service) |
Rory Toma <address@hidden> writes:
> On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 15:16, Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
> > Rory Toma <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > I believe that this is more flexible, takes advantage of things monit
> > > already does, and adds the least amount of code and complexity to the
> > > existing code. (I.e. I spent some amount of time figuring out how to get
> > > this in with the least amount of code)
> >
> > That was some very good arguments :-) One request though, if not
> > implemented, could you do: 'depend b c' as well?
>
> Version 2.
Maybe you can use the same "strategy" in the parser (p.y) for the
depend statement as we use in the checksum statement? the checksum
statement support both versions, e.g.
checksum file1, file2, file3
and/or
checksum file1
checksum file2
checksum file3
--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
- monit spawn.c, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/09/06
- monit spawn.c, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/09/12
- Potential FreeBSD bug, rory, 2002/09/13
- Re: Potential FreeBSD bug, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/09/13
- Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies,
Jan-Henrik Haukeland <=
- Re: Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/09/21
- Re: Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/09/21
- Re: Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20
- Re: Dependecies, Rory Toma, 2002/09/20