[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: monit '-i' option?
From: |
Jan-Henrik Haukeland |
Subject: |
Re: monit '-i' option? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 02:51:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) |
Jan-Henrik Haukeland <address@hidden> writes:
> (I still feel that this is a bit like trying to schedule threads by
> inserting sleep() into the code, it might work, but it is A bad and
> undependable hack :-)
Ps. Please delete "bad" above for the -S suggestion. In this case it
is not bad, it is just a bit undependable. But as Rory said, this is
tuning and a practical solution to the problem. Theoretical it may not
look so good, but as all of us know, there *is* a difference between
theory and praxis.
Pps. I'm of to bed..
--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
- monit '-i' option?, Martin Pala, 2003/09/13
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/09/14
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Christian Hopp, 2003/09/14
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Rory Toma, 2003/09/15
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Martin Pala, 2003/09/15
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/09/15
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Rory Toma, 2003/09/15
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/09/15
- Re: monit '-i' option?,
Jan-Henrik Haukeland <=
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/09/15
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Rory Toma, 2003/09/15
- Re: monit '-i' option?, Martin Pala, 2003/09/16