[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Release time
From: |
Aaron W. Hsu |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Release time |
Date: |
Thu, 27 May 2010 20:47:32 -0400 |
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 18:47 -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> Is that a reasonable timeframe for a major version change, or are
> they
> supposed to last longer than that?
I say, make your own time table. If you want to release a new major
version every three months, that's fine with me. The main point, IMO, of
having multiple version numbering instead of just constantly
incrementing a single integer, which is what I think is going on right
now, is the distinguish the types of changes. There's not reason to slow
down development just because the numbering scheme changes.
Aaron W. Hsu
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Release time - au stdio update, (continued)
Re: [Monotone-devel] Release time, Derek Scherger, 2010/05/27
Re: [Monotone-devel] Release time, Jack Lloyd, 2010/05/27
Re: [Monotone-devel] Release time, Thomas Keller, 2010/05/28
Re: [Monotone-devel] Release time, CooSoft Support, 2010/05/29
Re: [Monotone-devel] Release time, Stephen Leake, 2010/05/28
Re: [Monotone-devel] Release time, Derek Scherger, 2010/05/28
Re: [Monotone-devel] Release time, Ethan Blanton, 2010/05/28
Re: [Monotone-devel] Release time, CooSoft Support, 2010/05/29